A COMPARISON OF RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS OF SEVOFLURANE AND PROPOFOL-REMIFENTANIL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS
dc.contributor.author | Celik, Jale Bengi | |
dc.contributor.author | Topal, Ahmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Erol, Atilla | |
dc.contributor.author | Guven, Selcuk | |
dc.contributor.author | Kara, Inci | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T18:08:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T18:08:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: In this study we aimed to compare the recovery characteristics of propofol/remifentanil and sevofluran/remifentanil anesthesia in 100 geriatric patients undergoing urological procedures. Materials and Method: The patients were randomized to receive either propofol-remifentanil (group P) or sevoflurane-remifentanil (Group S) anesthesia. Recovery characteristics, the time to post-anesthetic discharge scoring system (PADSS) score and Aldrete score of 9 point, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Trieger Dot Test (TDT) values were compared between two groups. Results: Extubation time was significantly shorter in group P than in group S (5.3 +/- 2.9 min vs 7.8 +/- 3.8 min, p=0.038). The times of first eye opening, response to verbal commands and orientation were similar in both groups. The time of Aldrete score of 9 points (grup P: 14.2 +/- 3.6 min, group S: 16.3 +/- 4.5 min) and PADSS of 9 points (group P: 19.3 +/- 5.7 min, group S: 22.1 +/- 4.2 min) were also similar (p > 0.05). Time to return to the normal value of DSST was significantly shorter in Group P compared with Group S, and TDT was similar in both groups (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications and VAS score (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both propofol-remifentanil and sevoflurane-remifentanil appears to be an adequate anesthesia in geriatric patients. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 213 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1304-2947 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/26041 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 14 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000296697200006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | GUNES KITABEVI LTD STI | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | Sevoflurane | en_US |
dc.subject | Propofol | en_US |
dc.subject | Geriatrics | en_US |
dc.subject | Anesthesia Recovery Period | en_US |
dc.title | A COMPARISON OF RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS OF SEVOFLURANE AND PROPOFOL-REMIFENTANIL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |