A Comperative Study on Allergic Reactions Related to Various Anaesthetic Agents

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAltındiş, M.
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, S.
dc.contributor.authorÖzmen, S.
dc.contributor.authorÖkeşli, S.
dc.contributor.authorSütçü, A.
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:25:30Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:25:30Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study was designed to determine and compare allergic reactions due to IV anaesthetic agents used during surgical operations. From the Departments of general surgery, urology and orthopaedics 60 adults patients (27 male and 33 female with 35.9±12.5 mean age) having no tumoral-endocrine pathology or allergy/athopy history and being classified as ASA I and II were included to the study. They were divided into four groups as equal in number. The groups were similar demographically. After permission of the hospital's ethic comittee, the 4 groups were respectively infused with propofol (2.5 mg/kg) thiopentone (5 mg/kg), etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) for induction. Serum IgE levels (by ELISA using EIA-Bioclone, Australia) and eosinophil and basophil counts (by using autoanalyser) were measured in blood samples drawn both just before, after induction and 24 hrs later. As a result, we detected thiopentone to cause significant increase in serum IgE levels and eosinophil and basophil counts more than those of the other 3 agents (p<0.05). We concluded that, instead of using thiopentone, propofol, etomidate or midazolam may be a safer alternative for patients with an allergy/athopy history.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAltındiş, M., Tuncer, S., Özmen, S., Ökeşli, S., Sütçü, A., Baysal, B., (1997). A Comperative Study on Allergic Reactions Related to Various Anaesthetic Agents. Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon, 25(8), 352-355.
dc.identifier.endpage355en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-5150en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage352en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/16607
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyonen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAllergic reactionsen_US
dc.subjectEtomidateen_US
dc.subjectIgEen_US
dc.subjectMidazolamen_US
dc.subjectPropofolen_US
dc.subjectThiopentoneen_US
dc.titleA Comperative Study on Allergic Reactions Related to Various Anaesthetic Agentsen_US
dc.title.alternativeÇeşitli Anestezik Ajanlarm Allerjik Reaksiyonlarla İlişkisinin Karşılaştırılmasıen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu