Are the flowable composites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2004
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
E H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
The study aims to determine the shear bond strength (SBS) values of different flowable composites (Pulpdent(R) Flows-Rite, 3M(TM) Filtek Flow, and Heraeus Kulzer(R) Flow Line) in comparison with a conventional orthodontic adhesive and the bond failure sites of these composites. Eighty extracted human premolars were divided into four groups of 20 teeth each. Brackets were bonded to the teeth in each test group with different composites,. according to the manufacturer's instructions. SBS values of these brackets were recorded (in MPa) using a universal testing machine. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were determined after the failure of brackets. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey honestly significant difference, and chi-square tests. SBS values of groups 1 (Transbond XT), 2 (Flows-Rite), 3 (Flow), and 4 (Flow Line) were found to be 17.10 +/- 2.48 MPa, 6.60 +/- 3.2 MPa, 7.75 +/- 2.9 MPa, and 8.53 +/- 3.50 MPa, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that the orthodontic adhesive (Transbond XT) had higher SBS values than the flowable composites. Results of ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences among the groups (P < .05). The SBS values were significantly lower in all flowable composite groups than the orthodontic adhesive. ARI scores were significantly different between the orthodontic adhesive and all the flowable groups investigated. The use of flowable composites is not advocated for orthodontic bracket bonding because of significantly lower SBS values achieved.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
flowable composites, shear bond strength, adhesive failure side
Kaynak
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST
WoS Q Değeri
Q4
Scopus Q Değeri
Q1
Cilt
74
Sayı
5
