Microtensile bond strength of a filled vs unfilled adhesive to dentin using self-etch and total-etch technique

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSay, EC
dc.contributor.authorNakajima, M
dc.contributor.authorSenawongse, P
dc.contributor.authorSoyman, M
dc.contributor.authorOzer, F
dc.contributor.authorOgata, M
dc.contributor.authorTagami, J
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:03:55Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:03:55Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a filled adhesive (One-Step Plus; Bisco) versus an unfilled adhesive (One-Step; Bisco) on the microtensite bond strength (mu TBS) to dentin using total-etch (Uni-etch; Bisco) and self-etch (Tyrian SPE; Bisco) techniques. Methods: Twenty extracted human third molars were ground flat to expose occlusal dentin. After the dentin surfaces were polished with 600-grit SiC paper, the teeth were randomly assigned to four groups according to the bonding agent and technique being used. Dentin surfaces were bonded with One-Step Plus + total-etch; One-Step Plus+self-etch; One- Step+ total-etch and One-Step + self-etch. Composite buildups were performed with Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray Medical). Following storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, the bonded specimens were serially sectioned into 0.7 mm-thick stabs and then trimmed to hour-glass shapes with a 1 mm? cross-sectional area (n = 20). Microtensile bond strengths were determined using the EZ-test (Shimadzu) at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. Results: There were no significant differences in the mu TBS between One-Step Plus and One-Step adhesives when they were used with the total-etch and self-etch techniques (p > 0.05). However with the total-etch technique both adhesives yielded significantly higher bond strength values than the self-etch technique (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The fitted adhesive One-Step Plus did not show any beneficial effect than the unfilled adhesive One-Step on the mu TBS to dentin with total-etch and self-etch techniques. Irrespective from the adhesive type, self-etch technique revealed lower bond strengths than the total-etch technique. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.003en_US
dc.identifier.endpage291en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712en_US
dc.identifier.issn1879-176Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16214284en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage283en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/20586
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000236927800004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF DENTISTRYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectfilled adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectunfilled adhesiveen_US
dc.subjecttotal-etchen_US
dc.subjectself-etchen_US
dc.titleMicrotensile bond strength of a filled vs unfilled adhesive to dentin using self-etch and total-etch techniqueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu