Different Techniques in Fabrication of Ocular Prosthesis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCevik, Pinar
dc.contributor.authorDilber, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorEraslan, Oguz
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:24:50Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:24:50Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Loss of an eye caused by cancer, trauma, or congenital defect creates a deep psychological impact on an individual's life especially social and professional life. Custom-made prosthesis, compared to stock prosthesis, provides a better fit to the eye socket, better cosmetic results, and less discomfort to the patient in the long term. The main objective of this article was to describe 3 different alternative and practical techniques of fabricating custom-made ocular prosthesis. Case Report: An impression of anophthalmic socket was made with the addition of cured silicone-based precision impression material in all techniques. A master cast was prepared and duplicated with condensation silicone. A self-cure acrylic resin was polymerized in the silicone model and was fitted into the patient's eye socket. A digital photograph of the patient's iris was made using a digital camera and printed on good-quality photo paper in various shades and sizes in the first and the second techniques. Then the photo paper was coated with PVC so as not to allow any color flowing. The proper iris was then inserted to the acrylic base. The prosthesis was final processed using orthodontic heat polymerizing clear acrylic resin. In the other technique, after the trying-in process with wax pattern, an acrylic base was fabricated using heat polymerizing scleral acrylic resin. The prosthetic iris was fabricated from a transparent contact lens by painting the lens with watercolor paints and attaching it to an acrylic resin with tissue conditioner. The final process was made with heat polymerizing transparent acrylic resin. Conclusions: Custom-made prosthesis allows better esthetic and functional results to the patient in comparison to stock prosthesis. Further follow-up is necessary to check the condition and fit of the ocular prosthesis in such patients.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826701bben_US
dc.identifier.endpage1781en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275en_US
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23147321en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1779en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826701bb
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/27915
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000311889300101en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectCustom-made ocular prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectartificialen_US
dc.subjectmaxillofacial defecten_US
dc.titleDifferent Techniques in Fabrication of Ocular Prosthesisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu