Comparison of two different gingivectomy techniques for gingival cleft treatment

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, S
dc.contributor.authorBuyukyilmaz, T
dc.contributor.authorGelgor, I
dc.contributor.authorGursel, M
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:48:04Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:48:04Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractInterdental clefts or invaginations contribute to orthodontic relapse and poor periodontal health in extraction cases. These clefts or invaginations can be removed both by electrosurgical or conventional surgical gingivectomy techniques. This study investigates and compares the efficacy of two different techniques to remove gingival clefts with respect to periodontal health and patient tolerance. Twenty-two patients (mean age, 15.7 years) with bilateral gingival clefts participated in this study. In each patient, the gingival invaginations were removed by gingivectomy using electrosurgery on one side and conventional surgery on the contralateral side. The length and depth of the invaginations, the gingival index of the adjacent teeth, and the changes in visual analogue scale scores were recorded before and after the operation for both groups. Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze the data statistically. The results showed significant improvement in invagination depth and length and gingival index scores for both techniques. There were no statistical differences between the two gingivectomy techniques with respect to gingival health and patient tolerance. Both techniques can be used to remove the gingival invaginations efficiently.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage380en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15264650en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage375en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/18979
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000222164100019en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofANGLE ORTHODONTISTen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectgingival cleften_US
dc.subjectinvaginationen_US
dc.subjectelectrosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectconventional surgeryen_US
dc.titleComparison of two different gingivectomy techniques for gingival cleft treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
0003-3219(2004)074_0375_cotdgt_2_0_co_2.pdf
Boyut:
347.8 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu