Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKocabeyoglu, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Salih
dc.contributor.authorMocan, Mehmet Cem
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Banu
dc.contributor.authorIrkec, Murat
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:41:22Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAims: The aim of this study was to compare the visual field test results in healthy children obtained via the Humphrey matrix 24-2 threshold program and standard automated perimetry (SAP) using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA) -Standard 24-2 test. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 55 healthy children without ocular or systemic disorders who underwent both SAP and frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry visual field testing. Visual field test reliability indices, test duration, global indices (mean deviation [MD], and pattern standard deviation [PSD]) were compared between the 2 tests using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. The performance of the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2 SITA-standard and frequency-doubling technology Matrix 24-2 tests between genders were compared with Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: Fifty-five healthy children with a mean age of 12.2 +/- 1.9 years (range from 8 years to 16 years) were included in this prospective study. The test durations of SAP and FDT were similar (5.2 +/- 0.5 and 5.1 +/- 0.2 min, respectively, P = 0.651). MD and the PSD values obtained via FDT Matrix were significantly higher than those obtained via SAP (P < 0.001), and fixation losses and false negative errors were significantly less with SAP (P < 0.05). A weak positive correlation between the two tests in terms of MD (r = 0.352, P = 0.008) and PSD (r = 0.329, P = 0.014) was observed. Conclusion: Children were able to complete both the visual test algorithms successfully within 6 min. However, SAP testing appears to be associated with less depression of the visual field indices of healthy children. FDT Matrix and SAP should not be used interchangeably in the follow-up of children.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/0301-4738.119322en_US
dc.identifier.endpage579en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-4738en_US
dc.identifier.issn1998-3689en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24145558en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage576en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.119322
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/29328
dc.identifier.volume61en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000330854300008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofINDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectFrequency doubling technology perimetryen_US
dc.subjectpediatric visual field testingen_US
dc.subjectstandard automated perimetryen_US
dc.titleComparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu