Does the conduction velocity distribution change along the nerve?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorPehlivan, F
dc.contributor.authorDalkilic, N
dc.contributor.authorKiziltan, E
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:48:12Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:48:12Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.descriptionWorkshop on Biomedical Information Engineering -- JUN, 2000 -- Isik Univ, Istanbul, TURKEYen_US
dc.description.abstractNerve conduction velocity distribution (CVD) is a very useful tool to examine the state and function of nerves. Only one record of compound action potential (CAP) may be sufficient to determine the CVD if the shape functions of the single fiber action potentials (SFAP) of fibers are known. Otherwise, CAP recordings from different locations are necessary to determine CVD. In this case, we confront the problem of whether the shape of the CVD changes along the nerve, because many methods that attempt to determine the CVD are based on the assumption that the CVD is invariant along the nerve. There is not a complete solution to this problem, but there are many suggestions allied with the recording conditions to minimise this effect. The other effect that may influence both shapes of CAP and CVD along the nerve is the volume conductor effect. If a suitable model could isolate and eliminate the volume conductor effect, then the spatial variation of CVD may be attributed to the natural conditions of the nerve. In this study, we followed a procedure to eliminate volume conductor effect and then applied our previously published model to examine the spatial variations in CVD. The results show that CVDs estimated at discrete points along the nerve trunk have significantly different patterns. Consequently, it may be concluded that CVD is not uniform along an isolated nerve trunk contrary to the assumptions of the most CVD estimation methods. (C) 2004 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.02.009en_US
dc.identifier.endpage401en_US
dc.identifier.issn1350-4533en_US
dc.identifier.issn1873-4030en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15147747en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage395en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.02.009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/18999
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000221778600004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectcompound action potentialen_US
dc.subjectconduction velocity distributionen_US
dc.subjectfiber diameter distributionen_US
dc.subjectcciatic nerveen_US
dc.titleDoes the conduction velocity distribution change along the nerve?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
pehlivan2004.pdf
Boyut:
459.81 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu