Comparison of Arthrodesis, Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty, and Total Joint Replacement in the Treatment of Advanced Hallux Rigidus

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErdil, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorElmadag, Nuh Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Nejat
dc.contributor.authorBilsel, Kerem
dc.contributor.authorUcan, Vandet
dc.contributor.authorErkocak, Omer Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:41:19Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:41:19Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to compare the functional results of arthrodesis, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty, and total joint replacement in hallux rigidus. The data from patients treated from 2006 to 2010 for advanced stage hallux rigidus were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 38 patients who had at least 2 years (range 24 to 66 months, mean 31.1) of follow-up were included in the present study. Of the 38 patients, 12 were included in the total joint replacement group (group A), 14 in the resurfacing hemiarthroplasty group (group B), and 12 in the arthrodesis group (group C). At the last follow-up visit, the functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society-Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Interphalangeal (AOFAS-HMI) scale, visual analog scale (VAS), and metatarsophalangeal range of motion. Significant improvements were seen in the AOFAS-HMI score, with a decrease in the VAS score in all 3 groups. According to the AOFAS-HMI score, no significant difference was found between groups A and B. However, in group C, the AOFAS-HMI scores were significantly lower than in the other groups owing to the lack of motion. According to the final VAS scores, no significant difference was found between groups A and B; however, the VAS score had decreased significantly more in group C than in the other groups. No major complications occurred in any of the 3 groups. After 2 years of follow-up, all the groups had good functional outcomes. Although arthrodesis is still the most reliable procedure, implant arthroplasty is also a good alternative for advanced stage hallux rigidus. (C) 2013 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.jfas.2013.03.014en_US
dc.identifier.endpage593en_US
dc.identifier.issn1067-2516en_US
dc.identifier.issn1542-2224en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23659913en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage588en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2013.03.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/29311
dc.identifier.volume52en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000324002900007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectarthroplastyen_US
dc.subjecthallux rigidusen_US
dc.subjectmetatarsophalangeal jointen_US
dc.subjectresurfacingen_US
dc.subjectsurgical treatmenten_US
dc.titleComparison of Arthrodesis, Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty, and Total Joint Replacement in the Treatment of Advanced Hallux Rigidusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu