The effect on shear bond strength of different antimicrobial agents after acid etching

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, S
dc.contributor.authorDemir, A
dc.contributor.authorSengun, A
dc.contributor.authorOzer, F
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:58:12Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:58:12Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to determine whether the application of different primers containing antibacterial agents (Micro Prime (TM), Seal&Protect (TM), and Gluma Desensitizer (TM)) can affect the shear bond strength (SBS) of an orthodontic resin composite. Seventy-two crowns of extracted lower human incisors were mounted in acrylic resin leaving the buccal surface of the crowns parallel to the base of the moulds. The teeth were randomly distributed into three experimental and one control group, each containing 18 teeth. In each experimental group, the primers were applied to the etched enamel surfaces. In the control group, no antibacterial primer was used. An orthodontic composite resin was applied to the surface into cylindrical-shaped plastic matrices after application of an orthodontic adhesive primer (Transbond XT). For shear bond testing, a stubby-shaped force transducer apparatus (Ultradent) was applied at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute to each specimen at the interface between the tooth and the composite until failure occurred. A Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA and a Mann-Whitney U-test with a Bonferroni adjustment were used for statistical analysis. There was no significant difference between Seal&Protect (TM) (27.98 +/- 8.73 MPa) and the control (35.15 +/- 7.85 MPa) (P > 0.05). However, Gluma (TM) (21.61 +/- 7.96 MPa) and Micro Prime (TM) (14.89 +/- 5.55 MPa) caused a decrease in bond strength (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between Seal&Protect (TM) and Gluma (TM) (P > 0.05). As triclosan containing Seal&Protect (TM) did not cause a significant decrease in bond strength, it can potentially be used under an orthodontic resin composite to obtain an antibacterial effect. However, further in vivo studies are required.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cji032en_US
dc.identifier.endpage488en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16135539en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage484en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/19919
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000232425400010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleThe effect on shear bond strength of different antimicrobial agents after acid etchingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
malkoc2005 (3).pdf
Boyut:
267.75 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu