Effect of Various Endodontic Irrigants on the Push-out Bond Strength of Biodentine and Conventional Root Perforation Repair Materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGuneser, Mehmet Burak
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Makbule Bilge
dc.contributor.authorEldeniz, Ayce Unverdi
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:41:39Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:41:39Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various endodontic irrigants on the push-out bond strength of Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France) in comparison with contemporary root perforation repair materials. Methods: Midroot dentin of canine teeth was horizontally sectioned into 1-mm-thick slices. The canal space of each dentin slice was enlarged with a diamond bur to 1.4 mm in diameter. The samples were divided into 5 groups (n = 40), and the following materials were placed, respectively: Biodentine, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), amalgam, Dyract AP (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), and intermediate restorative material (IRM, Dentsply DeTrey). The samples were wrapped in wet gauze for 10 minutes and divided into 3 subgroups (n = 10) to-be immersed into 3.5% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), or saline for 30 minutes. No irrigation was performed in the controls (n = 10), and a wet cotton pellet was placed over each test material. After incubation for 48 hours, the dislodgement resistance of the samples was measured using a universal testing machine. The samples were examined under a stereomicroscope to determine the nature of the bond failures. Results: Biodentine showed significantly higher push-out bond strength than MTA (P < .05). The statistical ranking of push-out bond strength values was as follows: Dyract AP > amalgam >= IRM >= Biodentine > MTA. The push-out bond strength of Dyract AP, amalgam, IRM, and Biodentine was not significantly different when immersed in NaOCl, CHX, and saline solutions, whereas MTA lost strength when exposed to CHX. Conclusions: Biodentine showed considerable performance as a perforation repair material even after being exposed to various endodontic irrigants, whereas MTA had the lowest push-out bond strength to root dentin. (J Endod 2013;39:380-384)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelcuk University, Scientific Research Project Coordination CenterSelcuk Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was partially supported by a grant given by Selcuk University, Scientific Research Project Coordination Center and conducted in the Research Laboratories of Faculty of Dentistry.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.033en_US
dc.identifier.endpage384en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23402511en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage380en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.033
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/29427
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000316031200012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectBiodentineen_US
dc.subjectbond strengthen_US
dc.subjectirrigantsen_US
dc.subjectmineral trioxide aggregateen_US
dc.subjectpush-outen_US
dc.titleEffect of Various Endodontic Irrigants on the Push-out Bond Strength of Biodentine and Conventional Root Perforation Repair Materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu