Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Alone or With Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Orcun
dc.contributor.authorAkand, Murat
dc.contributor.authorEkin, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorIlbey, Yusuf Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorErdogru, Tibet
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:06:15Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:06:15Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Prostate cancer and inguinal hernia are common health issues in men aged more than 50 years. Recently, more data are accumulating that laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) can be performed in the same operation. The purpose of this study was to compare patients who underwent simultaneous extraperitoneal LRP (E-LRP) and LIHR with control patients who underwent only E-LRP in a matched-pairs design. Methods: Medical records of 215 patients were evaluated, and 20 patients who underwent E-LRP + LIHR were compared with 40 patients who underwent only E-LRP in a matched-pairs analysis. Preoperative clinical parameters (age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, Gleason score of the prostate biopsy, and prostate volume) and operative data (operation time, duration of catheterization, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, time to perform the anastomosis and its quality, and the percentage of patients with bilateral lymphadenectomy) were evaluated, as well as postoperative parameters (pathological stage, Gleason score, specimen weight, follow-up duration, biochemical recurrence, complication rates, and duration of postoperative analgesic treatment). Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the preoperative and operative parameters between the 2 study groups. Pathological parameters and the follow-up period and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Performing LIHR and E-LRP during the same operation is safe and feasible in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer and inguinal hernia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4293/JSLS.2015.00090en_US
dc.identifier.issn1086-8089en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26941545en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2015.00090
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/32290
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000385042200009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSOC LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectExtraperitoneal radical prostatectomyen_US
dc.subjectHerniorrhaphyen_US
dc.subjectInguinal herniaen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.titleLaparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Alone or With Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu