One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth
dc.contributor.author | Cetin, Ali Riza | |
dc.contributor.author | Unlu, Nimet | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T17:39:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T17:39:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of three direct composite resins and two indirect inlay systems in posterior teeth using the modified USPHS criteria. A total of 1.00 restorations were placed in the molars of 54 patients by one operator. All restorations were directly evaluated by two examiners at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using McNemar chi-square test at a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). Recall rate was 100% at 6 and 12 months, and all the restorations evaluated (i.e., 100%) received Alpha rating for the criteria of retention and gingival adaptation. At 12 months for the surface texture criterion, 80% of Filtek Supreme XT received Alpha rating while it was 95% for Tetric EvoCeram and AELITE Aesthetic. For marginal discoloration, 85% of Tescera ATL and Filtek Supreme XT received Alpha rating while it was 95% for Tetric EvoCeram and AELITE Aesthetic. Further, none of the restorative systems received a Charlie rating for any of the criteria at all evaluation periods. In summary, all the restorations demonstrated clinically satisfactory performance with no significant differences detected among them. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Scientific Research Foundation, Selcuk UniversitySelcuk University | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research project was supported by the Scientific Research Foundation, Selcuk University. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4012/dmj.28.620 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 626 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0287-4547 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19822994 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 620 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.620 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/23725 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000272514000014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | JAPANESE SOC DENTAL MATERIALS DEVICES | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | Nanocomposite resin | en_US |
dc.subject | Posterior composite resin | en_US |
dc.subject | Clinical evaluation | en_US |
dc.title | One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |