No Adverse Effect to Bonding Following Caries Disinfection With Chlorhexidine
dc.contributor.author | Ersin, N. K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Candan, U. | |
dc.contributor.author | Aykut, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Eronat, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Belli, S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T17:45:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T17:45:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2% chlorhexidine-based cavity disinfectant on the microtensile bond strength of 3 restorative materials to caries-affected and sound primary dentin. Methods: Eighteen exfoliated primary molars with occlusal caries and 18 sound primary molars were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups, according to the following restorative materials: (1) high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (GIC; KetacMolar); (2) resin-modified GIC (Vitremer); and (3) dentin adhesive (Prime&Bond NT) with a packable composite (Surefil). The molars were further divided into 2 subgroups according to the application of chlorhexidine-based cavity disinfectant (Consepsis). Standard restoration blocks of 5 mm high were built up over the treated surfaces. Bond strength results were evaluated using by 1-way analysis of variance, and multiple comparisons were done via Tukey's test (P<.05). Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the high-viscosity and resin-modified GIC and composite showed the highest bond strength values on both dentin surfaces. The distribution of failure modes between the high-viscosity and resin-modified GICs were mostly cohesive where adhesive failures were noted significantly in the composite. Conclusion: Using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate did not interfere with the microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer cements and composite. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ersin, N. K., Candan, U., Aykut, A., Eronat, C., Belli, S., (2009). No Adverse Effect to Bonding Following Caries Disinfection With Chlorhexidine. Journal of Dentistry for Children, 76(1), 20-27. | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1551-8949 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19341575 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 20 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/24166 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 76 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Belli, S. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Dentistry for Children | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | Biomaterials | en_US |
dc.subject | Chlorhexidine | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental materials | en_US |
dc.subject | Microtensile bond strength | en_US |
dc.title | No Adverse Effect to Bonding Following Caries Disinfection With Chlorhexidine | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |