In vitro antibacterial activities of root-canal sealers by using two different methods

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇobankara, Funda Kont
dc.contributor.authorAltınöz, Halil Cenk
dc.contributor.authorErgani, Osman
dc.contributor.authorKav, Kürşat
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:55:19Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:55:19Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of five different root-canal sealers (RoekoSeal, Ketac-Endo, AH Plus, Sealapex, Sultan). With the use of Enterucoccus faecalis as a test organism, both the agar-diffusion test (ADT) and direct-contact test (DCT) were performed. For DCT, sealers were mixed and placed on the sidewall of microtiter plate wells. A 10-mul bacterial suspension was placed on the tested material samples. Bacteria were allowed to directly contact to the sealers for 1 h at 37degreesC. Bacterial growth was then spectrophotometrically measured through every 30 min for 19 h by using an Anthos Labtec HT 2. For ADT, a 200-mul bacterial suspension was spread on brain-heart infusion agar plates. Freshly mixed sealers were poured into uniform wells punched in the agar. After periods of incubation at 37degreesC for 24 h and 7 days in humid atmosphere, the zones of inhibition of bacterial growth on agar plates were observed and measured. Ketac-Endo, Sultan, and AH Plus had similar results for DCT. These sealers were more potent bacterial-growth inhibitors than Sealapex and RoekoSeal. According to ADT, RoekoSeal showed no antibacterial activity. There was no significant difference among AH Plus, Sealapex, and Sultan (p > 0.05). Ketac-Endo demonstrated lower antimicrobial activity than these sealers (p < 0.05). Time had no effect on the antibacterial activity of the tested sealers (p > 0.05). The antibacterial efficiency of the materials varied according to the tests used. It was concluded that the technique, time, and ingredients of the tested material can affect the results of the microbiological studies.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/00004770-200401000-00013en_US
dc.identifier.endpage60en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399en_US
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid14760911en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage57en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200401000-00013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/19091
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000187944600013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleIn vitro antibacterial activities of root-canal sealers by using two different methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
cobankara2004.pdf
Boyut:
72.74 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu