Clinical outcomes of single incision laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEce, İlhan
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorYormaz, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:34:21Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:34:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Laparoscopic surgery has been a frequently performed method for inguinal hernia repair. Studies have demonstrated that the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach is an appropriate choice for inguinal hernia repair. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed to improve the cosmetic effects of conventional laparoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SILS-TAPP compared with TAPP technique. Materials and Methods: A total of 148 patients who underwent TAPP or SILS-TAPP in our surgery clinic between December 2012 and January 2015 were enrolled. Data including patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and recurrence rate were retrospectively collected. Results: In total, 60 SILS-TAPP and 88 TAPP procedures were performed in the study period. The two groups were similar in terms of gender, type of hernia, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score. The patients in the SILS-TAPP group were younger when compared the TAPP group. Port site hernia (PSH) rate was significantly high in the SILS-TAPP group, and all PSHs were recorded in patients with severe comorbidities. The mean operative time has no significant difference in two groups. All SILS procedures were completed successfully without conversion to conventional laparoscopy or open repair. No intraoperative complication was recorded. There was no recurrence during the mean follow-up period of 15.2 3.8 months. Conclusion: SILS TAPP for inguinal hernia repair seems to be a feasible, safe method, and is comparable with TAPP technique. However, randomized trials are required to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/0972-9941.181394en_US
dc.identifier.endpage41en_US
dc.identifier.issn0972-9941en_US
dc.identifier.issn1998-3921en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27251835en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage37en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181394
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/34884
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000390227300007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectInguinal hernia repairen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectsingle-incision laparoscopic surgeryen_US
dc.titleClinical outcomes of single incision laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repairen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu