Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBelli, S
dc.contributor.authorErdemir, A
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:04:10Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:04:10Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTo compare in vitro two different fibre placement techniques on reinforcement of root-filled molar teeth with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities. Fifty sound extracted human mandibular molars were used (n = 10). Group 1 served as control. From group 2-5, endodontic access and standard MOD cavities were prepared. Following root canal treatment, group 2 was kept unrestored. In groups 3 and 4, the teeth were restored with composite resin (AP-X; Kuraray, Japan). A groove was prepared on occlusal surface of the finished restorations in group 4 from buccal to lingual direction. Polyethylene woven fibre (Ribbond; Seattle, WA, USA) was inserted in the groove in combination with flowable resin that was cured for 20 s and covered with composite resin. Cavity surfaces were covered with flowable resin in group 5, and polyethylene fibre was placed into the bed of resin in a buccal to lingual direction before the composite restoration was placed. All specimens were stored in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Compressive loading of the teeth was performed by a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm min(-1) until failure. The data were recorded in Newton and submitted to ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. The mean load necessary to fracture the samples in each group was: G1: 1671.57 +/- 131.54(a); G2: 375.21 +/- 34.30(b); G3: 749.47 +/- 124.54(c); G4: 1224.36 +/- 132.17(d); G5: 926.88 +/- 118.28(e). Different superscript letters demonstrate significant difference between groups. Polyethylene fibre use over or under MOD composite restorations significantly increased fracture strength. However, when the fibre was placed on the occlusal surface of the restoration in buccal to lingual direction, significantly higher fracture resistance was observed.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01057.xen_US
dc.identifier.endpage142en_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2591en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16454794en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage136en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01057.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/20645
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000235099100007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNALen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectendodontically treated teethen_US
dc.subjectfracture resistanceen_US
dc.subjectpolyethylene ribbon fibreen_US
dc.titleReinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu