Effectiveness of a hydrophilic primer when different antimicrobial agents are mixed

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, AI
dc.contributor.authorUysal, T
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:48:22Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:48:22Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine whether different types of antimicrobial agents with hydrophilic primer applied to etched enamel surfaces will affect the shear bond strength (SBS) and the bracket/adhesive failure modes of metallic orthodontic brackets. Eighty noncarious human premolars were divided into four groups of 20 each. A composite resin (Transbond XT) was used to bond stainless steel brackets. Teeth in the first group were used as a control and bonded with standard procedures. For the other three groups, mixtures containing a hydrophilic primer (Transbond MIP) and one of three antimicrobial agents were prepared (Cervitec(R): in 1:2 ratio; chlorhexidine mouthwash and EC40(R) varnish in 1:1 ratio). These mixtures were applied to the etched enamel surfaces and thoroughly light cured for 20 seconds, and the brackets were bonded and light cured for 40 seconds. The SBS values of these brackets (Mpa) were recorded using a universal testing machine. Adhesive Remnant Index scores were determined after failure of the brackets. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey honestly significant difference, and chi-square tests. Results of ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in bond strengths among the various groups tested (P < .05). The bond strength values in these four groups compared favorably with those from other studies and the minimal bond strength values that are clinically acceptable. However, results of this study demonstrated that groups 1 (control) and 2 (Cervitec varnish) had higher SBS values than the other applications. Application of different antimicrobial agents may result in differences in the site of failure.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage419en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219en_US
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15264657en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage414en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/19025
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000222164100026en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofANGLE ORTHODONTISTen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjecthydrophilic primeren_US
dc.subjectchlorhexidineen_US
dc.subjectantimicrobial agentsen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of a hydrophilic primer when different antimicrobial agents are mixeden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
0003-3219(2004)074_0414_eoahpw_2_0_co_2.pdf
Boyut:
81.57 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu