Effect of surface treatments and different adhesives on the hybrid layer thickness of non-carious cervical lesions

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEliguzeloglu, E.
dc.contributor.authorOmurlu, H.
dc.contributor.authorEskitascioglu, G.
dc.contributor.authorBelli, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:26:43Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:26:43Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis in vitro study observed and compared the resin and non-carious sclerotic dentin interfaces generated by three different adhesives and two different techniques, using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Thirty-two human premolars, with buccal, non-carious cervical lesions, were used. The teeth were randomly divided into eight groups. Group 1: Sclerotic dentin was treated with Single Bond (3M). Group 2: After superficial sclerotic dentin was removed with a diamond bur (Diatech, Coltene), the dentin surfaces were treated with Single Bond. Group 3: Sclerotic dentin was treated with Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray). Group 4: After superficial sclerotic dentin was removed with a diamond bur, Clearfil SE Bond was applied. Group 5: Sclerotic dentin was treated with Xeno III (Dentsply). Group 6: After superficial sclerotic dentin was removed with a bur, Xeno III was applied to the dentin surfaces. For Groups 7 and 8, after the superficial sclerotic dentin was removed with a diamond bur, Clearfil SE Bond, with an additional 37% phosphoric acid gel, was used on the sclerotic dentin surfaces in Group 7 and Xeno III was used in Group S. In all groups, the cavities were restored with Filtek Supreme (3M). All the specimens were sectioned longitudinally and polished along the cut surface. The sections were treated with 37% orthophosphoric acid for five seconds, rinsed with water and treated with 5% NaOCL for 10 minutes. The specimens were then gold-sputter coated and evaluated under SEM. The thickness of the hybrid layer was measured on the gingival, occlusal and axial dentin interfaces. ANOVA was performed to determine whether there were any statistically significant differences in hybrid layer thickness. Post-hoc multiple comparisons were done with Tukey's test. Hybrid layer thickness was increased with all adhesives when superficial dentin was removed with a bur. Hybrid layer thickness showed significant differences between total-etch and self-etch systems.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2341/07-96en_US
dc.identifier.endpage345en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1559-2863en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18505226en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage338en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2341/07-96
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/22346
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000255434300015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOPERATIVE DENTISTRY INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOPERATIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleEffect of surface treatments and different adhesives on the hybrid layer thickness of non-carious cervical lesionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu