Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown

dc.contributor.authorSevimay, M
dc.contributor.authorTurhan, F
dc.contributor.authorKilicarslan, MA
dc.contributor.authorEskitascioglu, G
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:58:22Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:58:22Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Primary implant stability and bone density arc variables that arc considered essential to achieve predictable osscointegration and long-term clinical survival of implants. Information about the influence of bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown is limited. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 4 different bone qualities on stress distribution in an implant-supported mandibular crown, using 3-dimensional (3-D) finite element (FE) analysis. Material and methods. A 3-D FE model of a mandibular section of bone with a missing second premolar tooth was developed, and an implant to receive a crown was developed. A solid 4.1 x 10-mm screw-type dental implant system (ITI; solid implant) and a metal-ceramic crown using Co-Cr (Wiron 99) and feldspathic porcelain were modeled. The model was developed with FE software (Pro/Engineer 2000i program), and 4 types of bone quality (D1, D2, D3, and D4) were prepared. A load of 300 N was applied in a vertical direction to the buccal cusp and distal fossa of the crowns. Optimal bone quality for an implant-supported crown was evaluated. Results. The results demonstrated that von Mises stresses in D3 and D4 bone quality were163 MPa and 180 MPa, respectively, and reached the highest values at the neck of the implant. The von Mises stress values in D1 and D2 bone quality were 150 MPa and 152 MPa, respectively, at the neck of the implant. A more homogenous stress distribution was seen in the entire bone. Conclusion. For the bone qualities investigated, stress concentrations in compact bone followed the same distributions as in the D3 bone model, but because the trabecular bone was weaker and less resistant to deformation than the other bone qualities modeled, the stress magnitudes were greatest for D3 and D4 bone.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019en_US
dc.identifier.endpage234en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15775923en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage227en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/19947
dc.identifier.volume93en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000227683200006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleThree-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crownen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
sevimay2005 (1).pdf
Boyut:
370.82 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama: