Effect of temporary filling materials on repair bond strengths of composite resins

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErdemir, Ali
dc.contributor.authorEldeniz, Ayce Unverdi
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:26:43Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:26:43Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractEndodontic access cavities sometimes can be prepared through a permanent composite restoration. Between the appointments, temporary cements are used to seal access cavities and may have negative effect on bonding of further composite restoration. The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strength of composite to composite which had been in contact with various temporary filling materials. Standard cavities were prepared on 160 acrylic resin blocks, obturated with composite resin (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray, Japan) and randomly divided into eight groups (n = 20). Group 1 received no treatment. From group 2-8, composite surfaces were covered with the following cements temporarily: Zinc-oxide/calcium-sulphate (Cavit-G, ESPE, Germany), two different Zinc-Oxide-Eugenol materials (ZnOE, Cavex, Holland and IRM, Dentsply, USA), Zinc-phosphate cement (Adhesor, Spofa-Dental, Germany),Zinc-polycarboxylate cement(Adhesor-Carbofine,Spofa-Dental, Germany), Glass-Ionomer-Cement (Argion-Molar, Voco, Germany), or light curing temporary material (Clip, Voco, Germany). The cements were removed mechanically after 1 week storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C and composite surfaces were treated with a self-etch adhesive system (SE-Bond, Kuraray, Japan). Composite resin build-ups were created on composite surfaces. Shear bond strength values were measured using universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data was calculated in MPa and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. Eugenol-containing cements significantly reduced shear bond strengths of composite to composite (p < 0.05), while the other temporary materials had no adverse effect on shear bond strength (p > 0.05). These findings suggested that temporary filling materials except eugenol-containing materials have no negative effect on composite repair bond strengths. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbm.b.31017en_US
dc.identifier.endpage309en_US
dc.identifier.issn1552-4973en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18161822en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage303en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/22347
dc.identifier.volume86Ben_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000257929400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEY-LISSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectadhesionen_US
dc.subjectcompositeen_US
dc.subjectaccess cavityen_US
dc.subjecttemporary filling materialsen_US
dc.subjectrepair bond strengthsen_US
dc.titleEffect of temporary filling materials on repair bond strengths of composite resinsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu