Reproducibility and Agreement of Clinical Diagnosis of Occlusal Caries Using Unaided Visual Examination and Operating Microscope

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorZafersoy Akarslan, Zühre
dc.contributor.authorErten, Hülya
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Özgür
dc.contributor.authorSemiz, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:45:52Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:45:52Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To assess the reproducibility of clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries using unaided visual examination and examination with an operating microscope (16× magnification) and to determine the agreement between these 2 methods. Materials and Methods: Three experienced dentists used unaided visual examination and an operating microscope to grade, according to a standard caries rating scale, a total of 299 occlusal surfaces in 112 subjects (mean age 28.3 years, standard deviation 0.5 years), during several examination sessions. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was calculated, and agreement in diagnosis of the same teeth by different methods was also determined. Results: The level of intraobserver agreement for the 2 modes of clinical diagnosis was substantial, as indicated by kappa values; however, there was substantial interobserver variability with both techniques. Agreement in clinical diagnosis between the 2 techniques was 62.5% for observer 1 (kappa = 0.483), 65.4% for observer 2 (kappa = 0.531) and 63.5% for observer 3 (kappa = 0.508) (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Intraobserver agreement with the operating microscope and with unaided visual examination was roughly the same, but interobserver agreement was low with both techniques. For some surfaces, the diagnosis made by a particular observer with unaided visual examination differed from that made with microscopic examination. The diagnoses differed most frequently for surfaces that were scored as sound with unaided visual examination.en_US
dc.identifier.citationZafersoy Akarslan, Z., Erten, H., Uzun, Ö., Semiz, M., (2009). Reproducibility and Agreement of Clinical Diagnosis of Occlusal Caries Using Unaided Visual Examination and Operating Microscope. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 75(6), 455-455d.
dc.identifier.endpage455den_US
dc.identifier.issn0709-8936en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19627655en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage455en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/24182
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorSemiz, Mustafa
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Canadian Dental Associationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleReproducibility and Agreement of Clinical Diagnosis of Occlusal Caries Using Unaided Visual Examination and Operating Microscopeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
4182.pdf
Boyut:
393.62 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
İstatistik/Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu