The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in Class II adhesive restorations

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.contributor.authorOrucoglu, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorEskitascioglu, Gurcan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:18:27Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:18:27Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of two fibers (polyethylene or glass) and a flowable resin liner on microleakage in Class 11 adhesive restorations. Materials and Methods: Class 11 adhesive cavities were prepared on mesial and distal surfaces of 40 extracted sound human molars. The cavity margins were below or above the CEJ. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups according to the restoration technique: group 1: restored with a resin composite (AP-X, Kuraray) in bulk after SE Bond (Kuraray) treatment; group 2: flowable resin liner (Protect Liner F, Kuraray) was used before composite restoration; in group 3, a polyethylene fiber (Ribbond) and in group 4, a glass fiber (everStick NET, StickTech) was placed into the bed of flowable resin before composite restoration. Samples were finished, stored in distilled water for 7 days at room temperature, and then thermocycled for 300 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C. After sealing the apices, the teeth were varnished within 1 mm of the margins and placed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h at 37 degrees C. After rinsing, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally through the restorations and microleakage was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. Marginal penetration was scored on a 0 to 4 scale, and the data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: Flowable resin, everStick NET, and Ribbond THM used in combination with flowable resin significantly reduced leakage at occlusal margins in cavities with enamel margins (p < 0.05). When the leakage values on cervical dentin margins were evaluated, there was no statistically significant difference among the tested groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Use of flowable composite alone or in combination with polyethylene or glass fibers reduces occlusal leakage in Class 11 adhesive cavities with enamel margins.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage181en_US
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-9988en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17489478en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage175en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/21666
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000245749700004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectflowable composite resinsen_US
dc.subjectfiber-reinforced compositeen_US
dc.subjectmicroleakageen_US
dc.subjectcavity liningen_US
dc.titleThe effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in Class II adhesive restorationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu