Comparison of Modified Biophysical Profile and Doppler Ultrasound in Predicting the Perinatal Outcome at or Over 36 Weeks of Gestation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBardakçı, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBalcı, Osman
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Ali
dc.contributor.authorÇolakoğlu, Mehmet Cengiz
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:47:35Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:47:35Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAims: In this study, modified biophysical profile (MBP) and uterine and umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonographic (USG) analysis were compared in predicting the perinatal outcome of pregnancies at >= 36 weeks. Methods: Three hundred and fifteen pregnant women were included in this study. Following routine examination, amniotic fluid index, uterine and umbilical artery Doppler indices were evaluated. Nonstress test (NST) was done and MBP was generated. Non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS), perinatal mortality, 5-min APGAR score and umbilical artery pH results were used in evaluating the perinatal outcome. Results: In groups with abnormal MBP and Doppler analysis the results of all parameters were bad. The statistical difference between the groups of normal and abnormal MBP and Doppler analysis was significant. In predicting the NRFS, MBP sensitivity was 60%, umbilical artery Doppler was 50% and uterine artery Doppler was 30%. In case of combination of findings of MBP and umbilical artery Doppler, the sensitivity rose to 70%. Conclusion: MBP was proved to be more significant than Doppler analysis in prediction of NRFS and perinatal results, but the sensitivity was increased when both were combined, so combination of MBP and Doppler analysis instead of MBP alone is more significant in antenatal assessment.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBardakçı, M., Balcı, O., Acar, A., Çolakoğlu M. C., (2010). Comparison of Modified Biophysical Profile and Doppler Ultrasound in Predicting the Perinatal Outcome at or Over 36 Weeks of Gestation. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, (69), 245-250. Doi: 10.1159/000274488
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000274488en_US
dc.identifier.endpage250en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-7346en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20068331en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage245en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000274488
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/24726
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000274080600006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorBardakçı, Mehmet
dc.institutionauthorBalcı, Osman
dc.institutionauthorAcar, Ali
dc.institutionauthorÇolakoğlu, Mehmet Cengiz
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofGynecologic and Obstetric Investigationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectModified biophysical profileen_US
dc.subjectDoppler ultrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectNon-reassuring fetal statusen_US
dc.titleComparison of Modified Biophysical Profile and Doppler Ultrasound in Predicting the Perinatal Outcome at or Over 36 Weeks of Gestationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
4726.pdf
Boyut:
137.82 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum/Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu