Fracture Strength of Roots Instrumented with Self-Adjusting File and the ProTaper Rotary Systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCapar, Ismail Davut
dc.contributor.authorAltunsoy, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorErtas, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorAydinbelge, Hale Ari
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:50:50Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:50:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of roots instrumented with the Self Adjusting File (SAF; ReDent-Nova, Ra'anana, Israel) and the ProTaper system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and filled with the cold lateral compaction technique. Methods: In total, 50 mandibular premolar teeth were sectioned at or below the cementoenamel junction to obtain roots 13 mm in length. The roots were balanced with respect to buccolingual mesiodistal diameters and weight. They were distributed into 4 experimental groups and 1 control group (n = 10): no instrumentation (control group), instrumentation with ProTaper rotary files but no filling (PT), instrumentation with ProTaper rotary files and filling with cold lateral compaction (PT filling), instrumentation with SAF but no filling (SAF), and instrumentation with SAF and filling with cold lateral compaction (SAF filling). AH Plus sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was used along with gutta-percha points. One week later, a vertical load was applied to the specimen's canal until fracture occurred. Data were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (P =.05). Results: The mean fracture load was 244 +/- 51 N for the control group, 226 +/- 21 N for the PT, 242 +/- 45 N for PT filling, 233 +/- 14 N for the SAF, and 271 +/- 44 N for SAF filling. However, the differences were not statistically significant (P >.05). Conclusions: Instrumentation with the SAF or the ProTaper rotary system did not change the fracture strength of standardized roots with respect to cross-sectional diameter and weight.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.030en_US
dc.identifier.endpage554en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399en_US
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24666910en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage551en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.030
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/30880
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000334647400018en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectFracture Strengthen_US
dc.subjectinstrumentationen_US
dc.subjectroot fractureen_US
dc.subjectSelf Adjusting Fileen_US
dc.titleFracture Strength of Roots Instrumented with Self-Adjusting File and the ProTaper Rotary Systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu