Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Porcelain-Resin Bond Strength

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorOzyilmaz, Ozgun Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorDilber, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorTobi, Elif Sumeyye
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Hamdi Sukur
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:35:05Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:35:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of various surface treatments on the surface structure and shear bond strength (SBS) of different ceramics. Materials and Methods: total of 192 disk-shaped cores were prepared using two all-ceramic systems, of which 168 were submitted to SBS tests, and 24 were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The ceramics used were IPS Empress e.max (EX) lithium glass-ceramic and Vita In-Ceram Zirconia glass-infiltrated zirconia (ICZ). The specimens were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 12) on the basis of the surface treatment used: control; SB-sandblasting with 50 mu m Al2O3 particles; CJ-chairside silica coating with 30 mu m SiO2 particles and silanization (Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator); HF-etching in 5% hydrofluoric acid and silanization; ER-etching with an Er:YAG laser (10 W); ND-Nd:YAG laser etching (0.8 W); and FS-etching with a femtosecond laser (860 mW). A luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic) was photopolymerized on each treated ceramic disk. After subjecting the specimens to thermocycling (1000 cycles, 5 degrees C to 55 degrees C), SBS tests were performed using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests using a significance limit of 5%. Results: ong the EX ceramics, the CJ (29.10 MPa) and HF (26.07 MPa) specimens had statistically higher SBS values. For the ICZ ceramics, the highest value (28.08 MPa) was obtained for the CJ specimens. Conclusions: lanization after coating with silica improves the bond strengths of both EX and ICZ specimens, while HF etching is favorable only for the EX specimens.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.12387en_US
dc.identifier.endpage454en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-849Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26480029en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage446en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12387
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/35000
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000405822000015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectLaser etchingen_US
dc.subjectsilica coatingen_US
dc.subjectzirconiaen_US
dc.subjectglass-ceramicen_US
dc.titleEffect of Different Surface Treatments on Porcelain-Resin Bond Strengthen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu