Maxillary and mandibular mesiodistal tooth sizes among different malocclusions in a sample of the Turkish population

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Siddik
dc.contributor.authorBasciftci, Faruk Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorNur, Metin
dc.contributor.authorCatalbas, Bulent
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:15:13Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:15:13Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to establish normative data for mesiodistal tooth crown dimensions with respect to malocclusions and gender differences in Turkish sample. The subjects were randomly selected and assigned to three malocclusion groups according to Angle's classification. Each group consisted of 100 individuals between the ages of 13 and 18 years with the following distribution: Class I, 42 males and 58 females; Class II, 52 males and 48 females; and Class III, 51 males and 49 females. An electronic digital calliper was used to measure the mesiodistal tooth width from the right second permanent molar to the left second permanent molar on both upper and lower study casts. For statistical evaluation, one-and two-way analyses of variance and post hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) tests were performed. There were statistically significant differences for the maxillary canine (P < 0.001), first premolar (P < 0.05), second molar (P < 0.05), and mandibular canine (P < 0.01) for males, and for all maxillary teeth and the mandibular central (P < 0.05), canine (P < 0.001), and first premolar (P < 0.05) teeth in females among the malocclusion groups. When Angle's classification was evaluated, significant differences were determined, except for the first and second mandibular molars. All mesiodistal widths were also found to be statistically different according to gender dimorphism. A significant relationship was found between mesiodistal tooth size, Angle's classification, and gender. Therefore, tooth dimensions may play a crucial role in treatment planning and in achieving satisfactory interdigitation of the upper and lower dentition following the completion of orthodontic treatment.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjq111en_US
dc.identifier.endpage596en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387en_US
dc.identifier.issn1460-2210en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21097991en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage592en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq111
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/26632
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000295414500021en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleMaxillary and mandibular mesiodistal tooth sizes among different malocclusions in a sample of the Turkish populationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu