A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of a new, self-etching, dual-curable sealer: Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL)

dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorDerinbay, Oznur
dc.contributor.authorEldeniz, Ayce Unverdi
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:26:18Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:26:18Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. To assess the long-term sealing ability of a new dual-curable, self-etching, 4-META containing resin-based sealer: Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL in the United States) and compare with RealSeal and AH Plus sealers. Methodology. Root canals of 44 extracted and decoronated single-rooted human teeth were instrumented using a crown-down technique with ProFile 0.04 tapered NiTi rotary instruments to ISO size 30 and then to size 45 with K-hand files. Four roots were selected and used as positive and negative controls (n = 2), the rest were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 10) and filled using 0.04 tapered size 45 cones as follows: Group 1: AH Plus with gutta-percha; Group 2: Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) with gutta-percha; Group 3: Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) with Resilon point; and Group 4: RealSeal with Resilon point. The quality of seal of each specimen was measured after 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks using a fluid transport model. Measurements were made at 2-minute intervals for 8 minutes. The data were calculated as Lp and statistically analyzed using 2-way repeated measures of ANOVA and Bonferroni pairwise comparison tests (alpha = 0.05). Results. There were no significant differences among test materials in terms of fluid microleakage values (P = .126). There were statistically significant differences among the time periods (P = .009) and observed between 1- and 24-week test periods. There was significant interaction between root canal filling materials and time of testing (P = .048). Conclusion. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that recently introduced Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) showed similar sealing performance with RealSeal and AH Plus sealers when used either with gutta-percha or Resilon at 24 weeks. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: e45-e52)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordination Center (BAP) of Selcuk University, Konya, TurkeySelcuk Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported in part by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Center (BAP) of Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey, and the leakage test was done in Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry Research Laboratory. The authors would like to thank Sun Medical and SybronEndo companies for their generous material support to this work. They are also grateful to Professor Said Bodur and Assistant Professor Cos, kun Kus, for their assistance in the statistics.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.027en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE52en_US
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104en_US
dc.identifier.issn1528-395Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18801670en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpageE45en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.027
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/22147
dc.identifier.volume106en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000260758000029en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleA comparative evaluation of sealing ability of a new, self-etching, dual-curable sealer: Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar