Distracted mandible does not reach the same strength as normal mandible in rabbits

dc.contributor.authorBulut, Turker
dc.contributor.authorDurmus, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorMihmanli, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorDolanmaz, Dogan
dc.contributor.authorKalayci, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorSaglam, Haci
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:24:52Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:24:52Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. The aim of this study was to determine the resistance and fracture strength values of the bone with the use of biomechanical tests in different consolidation periods of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Study Design. In this study, 21 mature male New Zeland rabbits were used. After distraction, rabbits were separated into 3 groups to experience 4, 8, and 12 weeks' consolidation periods. Nonoperated hemimandibles of 6 rabbits were used as a control group. After 5 days' latency period, 0.5-mm distraction was applied twice a day, i.e., 1 mm/d lengthening. After the 5-mm lengthening application, we left the animals for 1, 2, or 3 months of consolidation period. Bending stress and strength values of the bone at fracture point were measured with the use of a 3-point bending test. Results. There were significant differences between the control and 3 study groups regarding bending stress and strength values. In addition, each study group was significantly different from each other. Conclusions. Bending stress and fracture strength of the bone may not reach that of normal bone after completion of 3 months' consolidation. It should be considered to keep in place extraoral appliances or comfortable intraoral distractors for a long period. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114(suppl 5): S140-S145)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelcuk University Scientific Research Foundation, Konya, TurkeySelcuk Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by Selcuk University Scientific Research Foundation, Konya, Turkey.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oooo.2011.09.024en_US
dc.identifier.endpageS145en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-4403en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23063390en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpageS140en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.09.024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/27919
dc.identifier.volume114en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000311369000020en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleDistracted mandible does not reach the same strength as normal mandible in rabbitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar