An Alternative Adhesive Strategy to Optimize Bonding to Root Dentin

dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.contributor.authorCobankara, Funda Kont
dc.contributor.authorOzcopur, Betul
dc.contributor.authorEliguzeloglu, Evrim
dc.contributor.authorEskitascioglu, Gurcan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:13:43Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:13:43Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study examined the hypothesis that the shear-bond strengths of AH Plus (AH) and Hybrid Root Seal (HRS) to root dentin might be optimized by using a powdered dentin-reinforced bonding procedure. Methods: The surfaces of root halves obtained from extracted human premolars were ground (800-grit silicon carbide paper), treated (5.25% NaOCl 17% EDTA for 5 minutes followed by distilled water) and randomly allocated into two groups according to the sealer and then into three subgroups according to bonding procedure. Dentin particles with a maximum size of 25 mu m were incorporated into the adhesive of Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, and groups were created as follows: no adhesive, adhesive alone, and with powdered dentin reinforced adhesive; 3 x 3 mm high buildups were created using sealer and allowed to set (37 degrees C, 100% humidity, 72 hours). Shear tests were performed (1 mm/min). Data were calculated as MPa and analyzed (two-way analysis of variance, Tukey test). Results: A significant difference was found between the groups (P = .000). Adhesive or reinforced adhesive had a negative effect on the shear-bond strength of AH, but they significantly increased the shear-bond strength of HRS (P = .000). HRS showed a similar bond strength with either adhesive alone or adhesive reinforced with powdered dentin. AH group was characterized by mixed failure, whereas the predominant failure type of the HRS group was cohesive failure within the sealer. Conclusions: Reinforcing adhesive resin with powdered dentin may be considered an alternative for optimizing the bonding of methacrylate-based sealers to root dentin and might affect the shear bond strength. (J Endod 2011;37:1427-1432)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.014en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1432en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21924196en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1427en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/26102
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000295661800019en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.subjectin vitro testen_US
dc.subjectpowdered dentineen_US
dc.subjectroot dentineen_US
dc.subjectself-etch adhesiveen_US
dc.titleAn Alternative Adhesive Strategy to Optimize Bonding to Root Dentinen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar