Porcelain laminate veneer conditioning for orthodontic bonding: SEM-EDX analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAksakallı, Sertaç
dc.contributor.authorİleri, Zehra
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorMalkoç, Meral Arslan
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Nilgün
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:06:40Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:06:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effects of different surface treatments and laser irradiation on the bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain laminate veneer. Porcelain laminate veneer specimens were embedded in the centers of acrylic resin blocks. Thirty-nine teeth were used for shear bond strength testing and the remaining three (one tooth for each group) were used for evaluation of the debonded bracket interface. Specimens were randomly divided into three groups, each containing 13 specimens. The details of the groups are as follows: Group SB, sandblasting with alumina particles (50 mu m); Group HFA, 9.6 % hydrofluoric acid etching; Group ER, erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er: YAG) irradiation (from 1 mm distance, 2 W, 10 Hz for 10 s). After conditioning, the upper central brackets were bonded to the porcelain surfaces. Porcelain laminate veneers were examined under stereomicroscope for adhesive remnant index and surface damage after debonding. The highest shear bond strength values were obtained with Group HFA (10.8 +/- 3.8 MPa) and Group ER (9.3 +/- 1.5 MPa), whereas Group SB revealed the lowest values. Scanning electron microscopy energy-dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX) analysis revealed that the silicon level in the porcelain decreased after debonding in all groups. The sandblasting method did not demonstrate any ideal bond strength values; however, the 9.6 % hydrofluoric acid etching and Er: YAG laser did. There were no significant differences among all groups in terms of laminate surface damages. The Er: YAG laser therefore can be selected for ideal bond strength and minimal damage to porcelain laminates.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-014-1682-5en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1834en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921en_US
dc.identifier.issn1435-604Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25344891en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1829en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1682-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/32438
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000360863300003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGER LONDON LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectLaseren_US
dc.subjectLaminateen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectBondingen_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titlePorcelain laminate veneer conditioning for orthodontic bonding: SEM-EDX analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu