Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
dc.contributor.author | Kara, Haluk Baris | |
dc.contributor.author | Dilber, Erhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Koc, Ozlem | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozturk, A. Nilgun | |
dc.contributor.author | Bulbul, Mehmet | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T18:24:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T18:24:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, laser irradiation) on the surface roughness of a lithium-disilicate-based core ceramic. A total of 40 discs of lithium disilicate-based core ceramic (IPS Empress 2; Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Specimens were divided into four groups (n = 10), and the following treatments were applied: air abrasion with alumina particles (50 mu m), acid etching with 5% hydrofluoric acid, Nd:YAG laser irradiation (1 mm distance, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W) and Er:YAG laser irradiation (1 mm distance, 500 mJ, 20 Hz, 10 W). Following determination of surface roughness (R-a) by profilometry, specimens were examined with atomic force microscopy. The data were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test (alpha = 0.05). One-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness following air abrasion was significantly different from the surface roughness following laser irradiation and acid etching (P < 0.001). The Tukey HSD test indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value of roughness (P < 0.05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid etching and laser irradiation (both Er:YAG and Nd:YAG) groups (P > 0.05). Air abrasion increased surface roughness of lithium disilicate-based core ceramic surfaces more effectively than acid-etching and laser irradiation. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10103-010-0860-3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 272 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0268-8921 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1435-604X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21110057 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 267 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0860-3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/27937 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000300588500001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER LONDON LTD | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | AFM | en_US |
dc.subject | Surface treatment | en_US |
dc.subject | Ceramic | en_US |
dc.subject | Laser | en_US |
dc.subject | Roughness | en_US |
dc.title | Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |