Effect of preload and heart rate on the Doppler and tissue Doppler-derived myocardial performance index

dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Kurtuluş
dc.contributor.authorBalcı, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorDüzenli, Mehmet Akif
dc.contributor.authorCan, İlknur
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAygül, Nazif
dc.contributor.authorAltunkeser, Bülent Behlül
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:17:18Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:17:18Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractDoppler-derived myocardial performance index (MPI) has been described as a noninvasive measurement of LV function. Our aim was to investigate the effect of hemodialysis related volume reduction and heart rate changes on the Doppler-derived LV MPI, and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) derived left and right ventricular MPI. Method: The study group comprised 32 consecutive patients (mean age: 43 18 yrs) undergoing hemodialysis. Patients underwent echocardiography before and immediately after hemodialysis session. Left and right ventricular MPI derived from conventional pulsed-wave Doppler and DTI was calculated. The difference in MPI, heart rate and body weight was calculated before and after hemodialysis. Results: Doppler-derived LV MPI, and right ventricular MPI obtained by DTI were increased (p = 0.05) but the LV MPI obtained by DTI was unchanged after hemodialysis. There is a significant positive correlation between the Doppler-derived LV MPI difference and volume reduction (r = 0.38, p = 0.032). The heart rate difference was correlated with Doppler-derived LV MPI difference, and DTI derived right ventricular MPI difference (r = 0.38, p = 0.034; r = 0.48, p = 0.006, respectively). Whereas, DTI derived LV MPI difference was not correlated with heart rate difference. By the multivariate analysis, there was no correlation between Doppler-derived LV MPI difference with heart rate difference, and volume reduction. Right ventricular MPI difference correlated with heart rate difference (r = 0.41, p = 0.021) but not with volume reduction. Doppler-derived MPI is partially influenced by preload and heart rate changes. However, DTI derived LV MPI is not influenced by preload and heart rate changes.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/clc.20109en_US
dc.identifier.endpage348en_US
dc.identifier.issn0160-9289en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-8737en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17674379en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage342en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.20109
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/21350
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000248208200006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCLINICAL CARDIOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectdoppler tissue imagingen_US
dc.subjectheart rate changesen_US
dc.subjectmyocardial performance indexen_US
dc.subjectvolume reductionen_US
dc.titleEffect of preload and heart rate on the Doppler and tissue Doppler-derived myocardial performance indexen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar