POLYTETRAFLUOROETYLENE TAPE AS TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIAL: A FLUID FILTRATION STUDY
dc.contributor.author | Olcay, Keziban | |
dc.contributor.author | SteIer, Liviu | |
dc.contributor.author | ErdoGan, Hilal | |
dc.contributor.author | Belli, Sema | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T19:06:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T19:06:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of temporary restorative materials at 24 hrs and 1 week. Materials and Methods: Endodontic access cavities were prepared in 56 extracted lower incisor-teeth and divided into 5 groups (n=10). Standard 5 mm deep access preparations were completed and root canals were prepared to size ISO # 30 file. The access cavities were restored as follows: Group 1: temporary restorative material (Ceivitron); Group 2: glass ionomer cement (Fuji II); Group 3: zinc oxide-eugenol cement (IRM); Group 4: zinc phosphate cement (Adhesor); Group 5: polytetrafluoroetylene tape (PTFE). The quality of the coronal sealing of each specimen was measured (24 hrs and 1 week) using fluid transport model. The data was analysed with repeated measurements of ANO VA, Tukey, Paired samples T-Tests. Results: A significant difference was found among the groups at all time-periods (p<0.05). At 24 hrs, PTFE showed similar leakage with Ceivitron, IRM, and Fuji II but it showed higher leakage than Adhesor. At 1 week, Ceivitron showed higher leakage than PTFE, meanwhile PTFE showed similar leakage with IRM, Fuji II, and Adhesor (p>0.05). Sealing ability of IRM and PTFE groups significantly increased by time (p<0.05 and p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, PTFE showed an acceptable short-term sealing capability when compared to the other commonly used temporary restorative materials at 1 week measurements. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17096/jiufd.08659 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 22 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2149-2352 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2149-4592 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28955541 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.08659 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/32437 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 49 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000409813800003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | ISTANBUL UNIV PRESS, ISTANBUL UNIV RECTORATE | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF DENTISTRY | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental leakage | en_US |
dc.subject | polytetrafluoroethylene | en_US |
dc.subject | temporary dental fillings | en_US |
dc.title | POLYTETRAFLUOROETYLENE TAPE AS TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIAL: A FLUID FILTRATION STUDY | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |