A comparative randomized trial of intubation success in difficult intubation cases: the use of a frova intubation catheter versus a bonfils intubation fiberoscope

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOnal, Ozkan.
dc.contributor.authorGumus, Irem.
dc.contributor.authorOzdemirkan, Aysun.
dc.contributor.authorCicekci, Faruk.
dc.contributor.authorSari, Mehmet.
dc.contributor.authorBayram, Hasan Huseyin.
dc.contributor.authorCiftci, Cansu.
dc.contributor.authorAslanlar, Emine.
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Jale Bengi.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T20:12:15Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T20:12:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: A difficult airway is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo surgical interventions. Therefore, many devices and algorithms have been developed for the management of a difficult airway. However no study has been conducted comparing Frova catheter (FC) and a Bonfils fiberoscope (BF) to date. Aim: To compare the effectiveness and success of two devices, a FC and BF, in difficult intubation cases. Material and methods: Design: Single-centre randomized controlled trial in patients with difficult airways. The assignment order was created by unplanned number charts, and the assignment was hidden in dosed covers, which were not unlocked until case permission had been provided. Setting: The trial was undertaken in a university hospital in Turkey. The primary analysis was based on 60 participants (n = 30, n = 30) with difficult intubation. The main outcomes were the success rates of placement of the tracheal tube in the trachea and the duration of the tracheal intubation process. Results: In the BF group, successful intubation was carried out in 25 of the 30 (83.3%) patients, whereas intubation was successful in 28 of the 30 patients (93.3%) in the FC group. Patients who could not be intubated with the first device were intubated with the other device. The mean duration of intubation was 109 (85-140) s in the BF group, whereas it was 38.8 (26-60) s in the FC group. Conclusions: Both devices were successful in difficult intubation cases. However, given the shorter duration of intubation using the FC and its lower cost as compared with that of the BF, the FC can be considered superior to the BF in difficult intubation cases.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOnal, O., Gumus, I., Ozdemirkan, A., Cicekci, F., Sarı, M., Bayram, H. H., Ciftci, C., Aslanlar, E., Celik, J. B. (2019). A Comparative Randomized Trial of Intubation Success in Difficult Intubation Cases: the Use of a Frova Intubation Catheter Versus a Bonfils Intubation Fiberoscope. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, 14(4), 486-494.
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/wiitm.2019.83610en_US
dc.identifier.endpage494en_US
dc.identifier.issn1895-4588en_US
dc.identifier.issn2299-0054en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31908693en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage486en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.83610
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/37394
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000500926400004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorOnal, Ozkan.
dc.institutionauthorGumus, Irem.
dc.institutionauthorOzdemirkan, Aysun.
dc.institutionauthorCicekci, Faruk.
dc.institutionauthorSari, Mehmet.
dc.institutionauthorBayram, Hasan Huseyin.
dc.institutionauthorCiftci, Cansu.
dc.institutionauthorAslanlar, Emine.
dc.institutionauthorCelik, Jale Bengi.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofVIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUESen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectintubationen_US
dc.subjectdifficult airwayen_US
dc.subjectintratrachealen_US
dc.subjectequipment and suppliesen_US
dc.subjectendoscopesen_US
dc.subjectcathetersen_US
dc.subjectFrovaen_US
dc.subjectBonfilsen_US
dc.titleA comparative randomized trial of intubation success in difficult intubation cases: the use of a frova intubation catheter versus a bonfils intubation fiberoscopeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Ozkan Onal.pdf
Boyut:
107.19 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Full Text Access
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon/Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu