Does the presence of hydronephrosis have effects on micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy?

dc.contributor.authorKaratag, Tuna
dc.contributor.authorBuldu, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorKaynar, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorInan, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorIstanbulluoglu, Mustafa Okan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:01:56Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:01:56Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the effects of presence of hydronephrosis on micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (micro-PNL) surgery. A retrospective analysis of 112 patients who underwent microperc surgery between December 2012 and April 2014 was performed. Patients were evaluated in two groups according to whether the presence of hydronephrosis. Stone size and location, fluoroscopy and operation time, stone-free rates and patient-related parameters were prospectively recorded into a centralized computer-generated system. A total of 58 patients in Group 1 with hydronephrosis and 54 patients in Group 2 with no hydronephrosis were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of stone sizes and body mass indexes (BMI) in comparison of groups (155.2 +/- A 93.06 vs. 143.70 +/- A 70.77 mm(2), p = 0.856 and 27.6 +/- A 4.2 vs. 26.7 +/- A 3.2 kg/m(2), p = 0.625). The success rates were similar (91.3 vs. 92.5 %, p = 0.341). While the mean operation time and fluoroscopy time in Group 1 were 44.2 +/- A 23.62 min and 105.3 +/- A 47 s, it was 38.8 +/- A 26.4 min and 112.53 +/- A 68.3 s in Group 2, but there was no statistical difference in comparison of both groups. The mean attempts of percutan puncture were 1.35 +/- A 0.47 in Group 1 and 1.76 +/- A 0.31 in Group 2 (p = 0.185). We also found no statistical differences regarding mean hemoglobin change and hospitalization time, respectively (p = 0.685 and p = 0753). In comparison of grades of hydronephrosis, there was no statistically significant difference in subgroups analysis. The presence of hydronephrosis does not affect success rates and operative time in micro-PNL procedures significantly. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy is technically feasible and efficacious both in hydronephrotic and non-hydronephrotic kidneys.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11255-014-0907-7en_US
dc.identifier.endpage444en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2584en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25563232en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage441en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0907-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/32019
dc.identifier.volume47en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000350362400003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectMicropercutaneous nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectHydronephrosisen_US
dc.subjectSuccess rateen_US
dc.titleDoes the presence of hydronephrosis have effects on micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar