Comparison of induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone in term primigravidae

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBalci, Osman
dc.contributor.authorMahmoud, Alaa S.
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Ali
dc.contributor.authorColakoglu, Mehmet C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:13:59Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:13:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. To compare the efficacy and complications of intravaginal misoprostol application before starting oxytocin infusion with oxytocin infusion alone for labor induction in term primigravidae pregnancies with low-Bishop score. Methods. This randomized study included 101 primigravidae women with singleton pregnancies >38 weeks and a Bishop score of <6. Group 1 (50 patients) received a 50-mu g dose of intravaginal misoprostol, with an oxytocin infusion started 3 h later. Group 2 (51 patients) received only an oxytocin infusion for labor induction. The time from induction to delivery, the route of delivery and complications were analyzed. Results. The mean time from induction to delivery was 10.4 +/- 2.1 h in Group 1 and 13.7 +/- 3.4 in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The rates of vaginal delivery, Apgar scores at 1st and 5th min, placental abniption, and postpartum hemorrhage were similar between the two groups. Conclusion. Intravaginal application of 50-mu g misoprostol before starting oxytocin infusion is a more effective method of labor induction than oxytocin infusion alone in term primigravidae pregnant women with low-Bishop scores.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/14767058.2010.531798en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1087en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476-7058en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476-4954en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21087166en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1084en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2010.531798
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/26257
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000294742100002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectLabor inductionen_US
dc.subjectmisoprostolen_US
dc.subjectoxytocinen_US
dc.titleComparison of induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone in term primigravidaeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu