Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorIlhan, Tolgay Tuyan
dc.contributor.authorSivaslioglu, Akin
dc.contributor.authorIlhan, Trkan
dc.contributor.authorUOar, Mustafa Gazi
dc.contributor.authorDolen, Smail
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:23:25Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:23:25Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Vaginal vault prolapsus is a challenging problem for the patients and physicians. There may be differences between young and elderly patients in terms of efficiency and safety of surgical procedures. Aim: The aim of our study was to compare the efficiency of the Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) procedure in older versus younger patient groups. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients who underwent the PIVS procedure were chosen. Twenty of these patients were younger than 60 years of age (Group I) while the other 20 patients were 60 years of age or older (Group II). Preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapsed Quantification (POP-Q) reference points were compared with postoperative data at the first year following surgery. Student's t-test was used to analyse continuous variables and the chi(2) test was used to analyse categorical data. The Mann-Whitney test was used for data that were not normally distributed. Results: Anatomical cure rates were 90 percent in both groups (p=1.00). There were significantly greater improvements in POP-Q points in group I than group II. Conclusion: It could be concluded that PIVS as minimally invasive procedure for vaginal vault prolapsed and is effective in all age groups.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7860/JCDR/2016/18360.8104en_US
dc.identifier.endpageQC7en_US
dc.identifier.issn2249-782Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn0973-709Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27630908en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpageQC5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/18360.8104
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/33386
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000397972300043en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPREMCHAND SHANTIDEVI RESEARCH FOUNDATIONen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCHen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectPelvic organ prolapsusen_US
dc.subjectRisk factor for recurrence prolapsusen_US
dc.subjectVaginal vault prolapsusen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groupsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu