Local Anesthetic Efficacy for Oral Surgery - Comparison of Diphenhydramine and Prilocaine

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUçkan, Sina
dc.contributor.authorGüler, Nurhan
dc.contributor.authorSümer, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorÜngör, Mete
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:26:13Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:26:13Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. Diphenhydramine has been suggested as an alternative local anesthetic agent for patients claiming allergy to local anesthetics. The present study attempted to determine the local anesthetic efficacy of diphenhydramine for oral surgery. Study design. Seventeen patients claiming allergy to local anesthetics were given diphenhydramine as anesthetic alternative and compared with seven nonallergic control patients treated with prilocaine. After determining an average value of vitality score of neighboring and contralateral teeth by electrical pulp stimulation, molar and premolar teeth were extracted and postextraction vitality scores determined. Visual analogue scale, anesthesia onset times, and the incidence of pulpal and soft tissue anesthesia were analyzed nonparametrically by means of Mann-Whitney U tests. Results. The mean onset time of pulp anesthesia with diphenhydramine (range, 4 to 7.5 minutes), excluding one failure, was not significantly different from that of prilocaine; (range, 4 to 13 minutes). The duration of anesthesia was significantly longer and the visual analogue scale lower in the group receiving prilocaine in comparison with the group receiving diphenhydramine. Conclusion. In the small group studied, diphenhydramine administration provided adequate anesthesia before oral surgery; it may be useful as an anesthetic alternative in patients with histories of allergy to local anesthetics.en_US
dc.identifier.citationUçkan, S., Güler, N ., Sümer, M., Üngör, M., (1998). Local Anesthetic Efficacy for Oral Surgery - Comparison of Diphenhydramine and Prilocaine. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 86(1), 26-30. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90145-7
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90145-7en_US
dc.identifier.endpage30en_US
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9690241en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage26en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90145-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/16775
dc.identifier.volume86en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000074868600008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorUçkan, Sina
dc.institutionauthorGüler, Nurhan
dc.institutionauthorSümer, Mahmut
dc.institutionauthorÜngör, Mete
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMOSBY-YEAR BOOK INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleLocal Anesthetic Efficacy for Oral Surgery - Comparison of Diphenhydramine and Prilocaineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
6775.pdf
Boyut:
463.22 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi/Makale
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu