Comparative evaluation of a new removable jasper jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination

dc.contributor.authorSari, Z
dc.contributor.authorGoyenc, Y
dc.contributor.authorDoruk, C
dc.contributor.authorUsumez, S
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:45:30Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:45:30Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the effects of an activator-headgear (FIG) combination to a Jasper Jumper (JJ) plus occipital HG, which was incorporated into removable upper and lower plates. The study group consisted of 60 subjects with mandibular deficiency and a vertical growth pattern. Of these, 20 were treated with JJ appliance-HG incorporated to removable upper and lower plates, 20 were treated with an activator-HG combination. Another 20 subjects who refused orthodontic treatment served as controls. Pre- and postreatment lateral cephalograms and hand-wrist films were gathered for all 60 subjects. Lateral cephalograms were manually traced before being transferred to RMO JOE software by a digitizer. Measurements that are not included in the software were measured manually. Thirty-five dental and skeletal parameters were used in the study. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS packet software. Wilcoxon paired t-test was used for intragroup comparisons. Differences between groups were evaluated by analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests. Results suggest that ANB angle was decreased significantly in both treatment groups compared with the controls. Increase in total facial height was greater in the activator group than in the JJ group. Vertical growth inhibition of lower incisors was greater in the JJ group. The activator-HG appliance was more effective on the mandible, whereas the JJ appliance was mainly active on the maxilla. Thus, ideal cases for JJ-splinted appliance should be high-angle cases, particularly with maxillary excess and some mandibular deficiency.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage293en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12828437en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage286en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/18396
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000183462200013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofANGLE ORTHODONTISTen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectclass II correctionen_US
dc.subjectfunctional treatmenten_US
dc.subjectjasper jumper applianceen_US
dc.subjectactivatoren_US
dc.subjectextraoral forceen_US
dc.titleComparative evaluation of a new removable jasper jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combinationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
10.1016@s0300-57120300006-x.pdf
Boyut:
180.95 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama: