Occlusal contacts with different retention procedures in 1-year follow-up period

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBasciftci, Faruk Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Tancan
dc.contributor.authorSari, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorInan, Ozgur
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:17:47Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this follow-up study was to evaluate the number of contacts in centric occlusion during a 1-year retention period in patients treated with 2 retention procedures and in a control sample. Methods: Twenty patients received modified wraparound Hawley retainers, and 20 received maxillary Jensen plates with mandibular fixed retainers. These retention patients were compared with a control group of 20 subjects with normal occlusions. Silicone-based impression bites were used to record occlusal contacts. Paired and independent-sample t tests were used to evaluate intragroup and intergroup differences. Results: Contacts increased in the total arch and the posterior combined (actual/near) during the retention period compared with the control group. In the Hawley retainer group, actual contacts on the second molars (P < .05), near contacts on the premolars (P < .05), and total contacts on the first molars (P < .05) and premolars (P < .01) had statistically significant increases. In the maxillary Jensen plate and mandibular fixed lingual retainer group, the number of actual contacts on the posterior segment increased. Actual contacts on the first molars (P < .01), second molars (P < .01), premolars (P < .05), and canines (P < .05), and total contacts on the first (P < .05) and second (P < .05) molars had statistically significant increases. During the observation period, some slight occlusal changes were seen in the control sample, presumably from growth and development. At the end of the study, during the 1-year follow-up period, no statistically significant occlusal contact differences were observed in the 3 groups. Conclusions: Retention procedures carried out in this study allowed relative vertical movement of the posterior teeth.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.052en_US
dc.identifier.endpage362en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17346591en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage357en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.052
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/21500
dc.identifier.volume131en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000244911300013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleOcclusal contacts with different retention procedures in 1-year follow-up perioden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu