Comparison of Anesthesia Methods in Treatment of Staghorn Kidney Stones with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBuldu, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorTepeler, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorKaynar, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKaratag, Tuna
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorUmutoglu, Tarik
dc.contributor.authorTanriover, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:23:23Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:23:23Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the treatment of staghorn calculi (SC) under spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA). Materials and Methods: Patients with SC who treated with PNL from 2011 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 100 patients mere divided into 2 groups according to anesthesia type: SA (group 1, n = 47) and GA (group 2, n = 53). Demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative analgesic requirements were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, or stone size between the two groups (P = .40, .30, .18, .20, and .50, respectively). The mean procedure times were 84.7 and 87.5 min in the SA and GA groups, respectively (P = .68). The complication rates were similar in the SA and GA groups (19.1% vs. 13.2%, respectively; P = .421). The stone-free rates were also similar in the SA and GA groups (61.7% vs. 52.8%, respectively; P = .374). No statistically significant difference was found in analgesic requirements. Conclusion: SA is a safe method without the risks of GA and may be used for conditions in which GA is contraindicated or in patients with concerns about GA. Our outcomes indicated that SC can be treated safely and effectively under SA.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2483en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-546Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26945650en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2479en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/33375
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000375243100002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUROL & NEPHROL RES CTR-UNRCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUROLOGY JOURNALen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectkidney calculien_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.subjectnephrostomyen_US
dc.subjectpercutaneousen_US
dc.subjectadverse effectsen_US
dc.subjectcomplicationsen_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectanesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectmethodsen_US
dc.titleComparison of Anesthesia Methods in Treatment of Staghorn Kidney Stones with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu