Comparison of mid-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic partial cystectomy versus conventional partial cystectomy for the treatment of hepatic hydatid cyst

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEce, İlhan
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorYormaz, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorÇolak, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Fahrettin
dc.contributor.authorAlptekin, Hüsnü
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:34:29Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:34:29Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term outcomes of open and laparoscopic partial cystectomy (LPC). Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent conventional partial cystectomy (CPC) and LPC for liver hydatid cyst from May 2010 to February 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, post-operative morbidity, mortality and mid-term follow-up outcomes were evaluated. Results: Amongst 130 patients, 38 patients were underwent LPC and 92 underwent CPC. Blood loss and post-operative complications were similar in both groups. The mean operative time in the LPC and the CPC groups was, respectively, 95.4 +/- 13.1 and 63.5 +/- 15.6 min, which showed a significant difference between the both groups. The mean length of hospital stay in CPC group was significantly longer when compared the LPC group. The mean diameter of cyst in LPC group was 6.1 +/- 1.1 cm and 7.8 +/- 2.1 cm in CPC group with a significant difference. The overall complication rates were 13.1% in LPC group and 17.3% in CPC group without significant difference. The most common complication was biliary leakage and surgical site infection. Conclusion: LPC for the surgical treatment of liver hydatid cyst appears to be safe and effective method with low morbidity rates in selected patients.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/jmas.JMAS_238_16en_US
dc.identifier.endpage302en_US
dc.identifier.issn0972-9941en_US
dc.identifier.issn1998-3921en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28872100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage296en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_238_16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/34905
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000417269200010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectCystectomyen_US
dc.subjecthepaticen_US
dc.subjecthydatid cysten_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopic surgeryen_US
dc.titleComparison of mid-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic partial cystectomy versus conventional partial cystectomy for the treatment of hepatic hydatid cysten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu