Conventional and high intensity halogen light effects on water sorption and microhardness of orthodontic adhesives

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Tancan
dc.contributor.authorBasciftci, Faruk Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorSener, Yagmur
dc.contributor.authorBotsali, Murat Selim
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Abdullah
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:26:35Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:26:35Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To test the null hypothesis that when the equivalent total light energy is irradiated to three orthodontic adhesive resins, there is no difference between the microhardness and water sorption values regardless of the curing light sources. Materials and Methods: Samples were divided into six groups according to the combination of three orthodontic adhesives (Kurasper F, Light-Bond, Transbond XT) and two light intensities (quartz tungsten halogen [QTH] and high intensity quartz tungsten halogen [HQTH]). One half of each of the 40 samples of three adhesive pastes was polymerized for 20 seconds by a QTH light source, and the other half was polymerized for 10 seconds by a HQTH light source. Water sorption was determined and Vickers hardness was established with three measurements per sample at the top, center, and bottom. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons (Tukey-HSD). Results: Statistically significant differences were found among all adhesives for water sorption and hardness values cured with QTH and HQTH. The HQTH curing unit resulted in higher values than did the QTH. The highest water sorption values were observed for Kurasper F cured with HQTH and the lowest value was observed for Transbond XT cured with QTH. For microhardness Light-Bond cured with HQTH produced the highest values, and Transbond XT cured with QTH produced the lowest. Conclusions: When the equivalent total light energy is irradiated to three orthodontic adhesive resins, there are significant differences between the microhardness and water sorption values cured with the QTH and HQTH light source. The null hypothesis is rejected.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/020507-56.1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage139en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18193956en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage134en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2319/020507-56.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/22288
dc.identifier.volume78en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000252511100022en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofANGLE ORTHODONTISTen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectwater sorptionen_US
dc.subjectvickers hardnessen_US
dc.subjecthalogenen_US
dc.subjectcompositesen_US
dc.titleConventional and high intensity halogen light effects on water sorption and microhardness of orthodontic adhesivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu