Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Function and Myocardial Mass: A Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography with Cardiac MRI and Echocardiography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKara, Bedia
dc.contributor.authorNayman, Alaaddin
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorGul, Enes Elvin
dc.contributor.authorKoplay, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorPaksoy, Yahya
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:25:54Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this study was to compare the left ventricular parameters obtained from multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) studies with two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is accepted as the gold standard in the evaluation of left ventricular functions. The study also aimed to evaluate whether or not there is a relationship between the MR-Argus and CMR tools software programs which are used in post-process calculations of data obtained by MRI. Material/Methods: Forty patients with an average age of 51.4 +/- 14.9 years who had been scanned with cardiac MDCT were evaluated with cardiac MRI and 2DE. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output (CO), and myocardial mass values calculated by MDCT, MRI, and 2DE were compared with each other. Two different MR software programs were used to compare left ventricular functions. The CMR tools LV tutorials method is accepted as the gold standard because it can be used in three-dimensional functional evaluation. The Pearson Correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to compare the results from the two MR methods (MR-Argus and CMR tools) and the results from both the MDCT and the 2DE with the CMR tools results. Results: Strong positive correlations for EF values were found between the MDCT and CMR tools (r=0.702 p<0.001), and between the MR-Argus and CMR tools (r=0.746 p<0.001). The correlation between the 2DE and CMR tools (r=0.449 p<0.004), however, was only moderate. Similar results were obtained for the other parameters. The strongest correlation for ESV, EDV, and EF was between the two MR software programs. The correlation coefficient between the MDCT and CMR tools is close to the correlation coefficient between the two software programs. While the correlation between 2DE and CMR tools was satisfactory for ESV, EDV, and CO values, it was at a moderate level for the other parameters. Conclusions: Left ventricular functional analysis can be performed easily and reliably with cardiac MDCT used for coronary artery evaluation and it also gives more accurate results than 2DE.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/PJR.895843en_US
dc.identifier.endpage102en_US
dc.identifier.issn0137-7183en_US
dc.identifier.issn1899-0967en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27026794en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage95en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.895843
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/33922
dc.identifier.volume81en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000386238500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherINT SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPOLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectEchocardiographyen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectMultidetector Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectVentricular Functionen_US
dc.subjectLeften_US
dc.titleQuantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Function and Myocardial Mass: A Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography with Cardiac MRI and Echocardiographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu