Can demineralized enamel surfaces be bonded safely?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBaka, Zeliha Muge
dc.contributor.authorIleri, Zehra
dc.contributor.authorBasciftci, Faruk Ayhan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:49:39Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:49:39Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. To evaluate and compare the effects of enamel demineralization, microabrasion therapy and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel surfaces and enamel color. Materials and methods. Eighty freshly extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were allocated to one of the four groups. Brackets were bonded directly to non-demineralized enamel surfaces in Group I (control group), directly to the demineralized enamel surfaces in Group II, to demineralized enamel surfaces after CPP-ACP application in Group III and to demineralized enamel surfaces after microabrasion therapy in Group IV. The samples were stored in water for 24 h at 37 degrees C and then underwent thermocycling. The SBS in megapascals (MPa) was determined by a shear test with 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed and failure types were classified with modified adhesive remnant index scores. The data were analyzed with one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), Tukey and chi-square tests at the alpha = 0.05 level. Results. Significant differences were found among the four groups (F = 21.57, p < 0.01). No significant difference was found between Group I and III (17.12 +/- 2.84 and 15.08 +/- 3.42 MPa, respectively) or between Group III and IV (12.82 +/- 2.64 MPa). The lowest SBS value was determined in Group II (5.88 +/- 2.12 MPa). Enamel demineralization, microabrasion therapy and CPP-ACP application affected enamel color significantly. Conclusion. CPP-ACP application and microabrasion therapy are able to increase the decreased SBS of orthodontic brackets because of enamel demineralization.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/00016357.2013.823646en_US
dc.identifier.endpage289en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357en_US
dc.identifier.issn1502-3850en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23964632en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage283en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.823646
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/30657
dc.identifier.volume72en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000335002400005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectCPP-ACPen_US
dc.subjectdemineralizationen_US
dc.subjectmicroabrasionen_US
dc.subjectshear bonding strengthen_US
dc.titleCan demineralized enamel surfaces be bonded safely?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu