Composite Bond Strength to Intact Enamel with Current Simplified Adhesives

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKahveci, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:14:01Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:14:01Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study compared microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of six simplified adhesive systems and an etch-and-rinse, one-bottle adhesive system to intact enamel. Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight sound incisor teeth were cut at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) under water cooling. The enamel surfaces were cleaned with pumice, randomly assigned to seven groups and treated with one of the following adhesives: Hybrid Bond (Sun Medical); AdheSE One (Ivoclar/Vivadent); One Coat 7.0 (Coltene/Whaledent); Danville Experimental (Danville Materials); Clearfil S-3 Bond (Kuraray); G Bond (GC); and Prelude Total-etch (Danville Materials) as control. Composite resin (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) buildups were created and after 24 h, the teeth were sectioned into beams of 1.0 mm(2) cross-sectional area. Each beam was tested in a microtensile tester (Bisco) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were calculated as MPa and analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were done using the Tukey test. Results: mu TBS values of adhesives to intact enamel were as follows (mean +/- SD; different letters indicate statistically different groups, p < 0.05): Hybrid Bond: 15.62 +/- 3.90(a); AdheSE One: 17.29 +/- 3.88(ab); One Coat 7.0: 19.59 +/- 3.95(abc); Danville Experimental: 18.65 +/- 5.33(abc); Clearfil S-3 Bond:20.89 +/- 2.96(bcd); G Bond: 23.49 +/- 4.21(cd); Prelude Total-etch: 25.79 +/- 5.24(d). Conclusions: Clearfil S-3 Bond and G Bond showed bond strength similar to Prelude Total-etch (p = 0.064). The other simplified adhesives showed a similar performance (p = 0.239), however, mu TBS values to intact enamel of these systems were lower than those obtained by Prelude Total-etch (p < 0.05).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Coordination Center (BAP) of Selcuk University, Konya, TurkeySelcuk Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Center (BAP) of Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey. The authors thank the companies for their generous material support of this work. They are also grateful to Dr. Serhan Akman for his assistance in the statistical analysis and to Dr. Oguz Eraslan for the schematic drawing.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a18514en_US
dc.identifier.endpage37en_US
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-9988en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21403934en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage31en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18514
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/26268
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000287638100004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectall-in-one adhesivesen_US
dc.subjectintact enamelen_US
dc.subjectenamel bondingen_US
dc.subjectprismless layeren_US
dc.subjectself-etching primeren_US
dc.subjectmicrotensileen_US
dc.titleComposite Bond Strength to Intact Enamel with Current Simplified Adhesivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu