Evaluation of related factors in the failure of endodontically treated teeth: a cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorOlcay, Keziban.
dc.contributor.authorAtaoglu, Hanife.
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:53:51Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:53:51Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to review the factors related to the failure and extraction of unsuccessful endodontically treated teeth. Methods: A total of 1000 teeth treated with nonsurgical root canal therapy were analyzed, and the following information was recorded for each patient: reasons for failure and extraction, type of tooth, presence and type of coronal restoration, smoking status, age, gender, and level of education. One main reason was recorded for each failed tooth. The associations between reasons for failure, patient, and tooth were tested by using chi(2) analysis. Results: Of the 1000 endodontically failed teeth analyzed in this study, 28.1% (n = 281) were extracted, 66% (n = 660) were re-treated, and 5.9% (n = 59) were treated with apical surgery. Among the reasons for failure, restorative and endodontic reasons were seen most frequently (43.9%, n = 439), whereas orthodontic reasons were seldom seen (0.1%, n = 1). The most common reason for extraction was for prosthetic reasons (40.8%), and perforation/stripping was the least common (2.9%). The mandibular first molars were the most frequently extracted teeth (27.4%, n = 77). Conclusions: The most common reason for the extraction of endodontically treated teeth was for prosthetic reasons. Among the reasons for failure, restorative and endodontic reasons were the most frequently seen, and orthodontic reasons were the most seldom. The teeth that failed most frequently were mandibular first molars, and the teeth that failed least frequently were maxillary third molars. The most common reason for the extraction of failed endodontically treated teeth was for prosthetic reasons.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Coordination Center of Selcuk University (BAP), Konya, Turkey [11202018]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study has been supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Center of Selcuk University (BAP), Konya, Turkey (project number: 11202018). This study was performed in Endodontics and Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Departments of Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOlcay, K., Ataoglu, H., Belli, S. (2018). Evaluation of Related Factors in the Failure of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Endodontics, 44(1), 38-45.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.029en_US
dc.identifier.endpage45en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399en_US
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29246376en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage38en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/36605
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000418878600007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAtaoglu, Hanife.
dc.institutionauthorBelli, Sema.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectEndodontically treated teethen_US
dc.subjectextractionen_US
dc.subjectfailureen_US
dc.subjectretreatmenten_US
dc.subjectroot canal treatmenten_US
dc.titleEvaluation of related factors in the failure of endodontically treated teeth: a cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar