Effects of Fast Halogen and Plasma Arc Curing Lights on the Surface Hardness of Orthodontic Adhesives for Lingual Retainers

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÜşümez, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorBüyükyılmaz, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Ali İhya
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:45:40Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:45:40Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this study were to (1) identify the optimum cure times of 2 different lingual retainer adhesives with a conventional halogen, a fast halogen, and a plasma arc light by measuring Vickers surface hardness, and (2) determine whether different lights produce similar surface hardness values for the same adhesive resin material. The investigated plasma arc curing unit was the PowerPac (American Dental Technologies, Corpus Christi, Tex), and the fast halogen unit was the Optilux 501 (Kerr, Orange, Calif). A conventional curing unit, the Ortholux XT (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minn) was used as the control. Two orthodontic lingual retainer adhesives were used: Transbond Lingual Retainer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and Light Cure Retainer (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, III). Concise (3M Dental Products) and diluted Concise were used as controls. Transbond Lingual Retainer was polymerized by the PowerPac light in 6 seconds, by the Optilux in 10 seconds, and by the conventional halogen light in 20 seconds. The minimum curing times for Light Cure Retainer adhesive were 15 seconds for PowerPac, 10 seconds for Optilux, and 40 seconds for conventional halogen. Surface hardness values for each resin did not differ significantly with different curing units. However, different adhesives demonstrated significantly different surface hardness values. Final Vickers surface hardness values (averaged across curing units) of Transbond Lingual Retainer, Concise, diluted Concise, and Light Cure Retainer were 62.8, 52.4, 46.0, and 40.4, respectively. Plasma arc or fast halogen units polymerize resin composite adhesive in much shorter times than do conventional curing units, without a significant loss in surface hardness. Therefore, these units are suggested for clinical use to save chairside time.en_US
dc.identifier.citationÜşümez, S., Büyükyılmaz, T., Karaman, A. İ., (2003). Effects of Fast Halogen and Plasma Arc Curing Lights on the Surface Hardness of Orthodontic Adhesives for Lingual Retainers. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 123(6), 641-648. Doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00201-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00201-4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage648en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12806343en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage641en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00201-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/18450
dc.identifier.volume123en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000183604500010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorÜşümez, Serdar
dc.institutionauthorBüyükyılmaz, Tamer
dc.institutionauthorKaraman, Ali İhya
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby, Inc en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleEffects of Fast Halogen and Plasma Arc Curing Lights on the Surface Hardness of Orthodontic Adhesives for Lingual Retainers en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
10.1016@s0889-54060300201-4.pdf
Boyut:
439.3 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Ortodonti/Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu