In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluations of Microleakage Around Class I Amalgam and Composite Restorations

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAlptekin, Tuncay
dc.contributor.authorÖzer, Füsan
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Nimet
dc.contributor.authorÇobanoğlu, Nevin
dc.contributor.authorBlatz, Markus B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:49:08Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:49:08Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated and compared microleakage values of in vivo and in vitro placed Class I amalgam restorations with or without three different lining materials and posterior composite restorations with two dentin bonding agents. For the in vivo group, 72 standardized Class I cavities were prepared on the occlusal surfaces of molars scheduled for extraction. The test groups (n=12) were: amalgam without lining (A), amalgam with cavity varnish (A+C), amalgam with Clearfil SE Bond (A+CSE), amalgam with Clearfil 2V (A+C2V), composite with Clearfil SE Bond (C+CSE) and composite with Protect Bond (C+PB). The restored teeth were extracted after seven days. The same grouping, materials and techniques were used in 72 extracted molars for the in-vitro part of the study. The specimens were immersed in basic fuchsin for 24 hours and sectioned. Microleakage was examined and scored at 20x magnification. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests with the 5% level of significance. Overall, the in vivo and in vitro test groups were not different from each other. No significant differences in microleakage values were observed between the unlined and lined amalgam groups (p>0.05). However, since lined amalgam restorations did not reveal any marginal leakage, the application of an adhesive bonding material under the amalgam restorations can be considered. In general, cavity varnish was not as effective as adhesive bonding agents in preventing microleakage in amalgam restorations. Composite restorations demonstrated higher leakage values than amalgam restorations (p<0.05), except for A+C (p>0.05) in the in vivo group. There was no significant difference between the two composite groups for in vitro and in vivo conditions (p>0.05).en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlptekin, T., Özer, F., Ünlü, N., Çobanoğlu, N., Blatz, M. B., (2010). In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluations of Microleakage Around Class I Amalgam and Composite Restorations. Operative Dentistry, 35(6), 641-648. Doi: 10.2341/10-065-L
dc.identifier.doi10.2341/10-065-Len_US
dc.identifier.endpage648en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1559-2863en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21180003en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage641en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2341/10-065-L
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/24996
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000284566500008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorÜnlü, N.
dc.institutionauthorÇobanoğlu, N.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleIn Vivo and in Vitro Evaluations of Microleakage Around Class I Amalgam and Composite Restorationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
4996.pdf
Boyut:
1.21 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Restoratif Diş Tedavisi/Makale Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu